Starting from this interesting post from @arcange: Is Hive decentralized and who governs it? we want to know your opinion about some suggestion we made in this comment :
we-the-people thinks that from Steemit to Hive we have done a quantum leap in the right direction of decentralization.
we-the-people is a witness that try to propose a new point of view about how really decentralize the governance of Hive first using Dpoll to ask users what do they think about what to do.
The fact is that, also here in Hive, a very few people, that de facto are a closed club of whales, have too much power.
The smallest is this club, the easier is to repeat the bad experience that we all face in Steemit.
What we can do?
Please, feel free to add in the comment any other suggestion you have.
better distribute producer rewards (more to small, less to the first 20)
reduce the number of witness that a user can vote (less that 20!)
balance number of votes and power of voter creating witness rank
eliminate downvotes
ask people what to do using pools or in any other way
create a Proof of Activity that ranks users based on how much they produce value for Hive (the more you post and/or you vote etc. the more you go up in the rank) and use this rank to balance the VP
You need to be logged in to vote for
the polls.
Click to log in
via HiveSigner.
better distribute producer rewards (more to small, less to the first 20)
(33.33%)
8
/ 24
33.33% Complete (success)
create a Proof of Activity that ranks users based on how much they produce value for Hive (the more you post and/or you vote etc. the more you go up in the rank) and use this rank to balance the VP
(29.17%)
7
/ 24
29.17% Complete (success)
balance number of votes and power of voter creating witness rank
(12.5%)
3
/ 24
ask people what to do using pools or in any other way
(12.5%)
3
/ 24
eliminate downvotes
(8.33%)
2
/ 24
reduce the number of witness that a user can vote (less that 20!)
(4.17%)
1
/ 24
